View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0000668 | CaseTalk Modeler | Validation | public | 2015-05-07 12:22 | 2022-01-10 20:40 |
Reporter | BCP Software | Assigned To | BCP Software | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | sometimes |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | 6.5 | ||||
Target Version | Future | Fixed in Version | 9.5.2 | ||
Summary | 0000668: Validation of N and N-1 rule should include OTE awareness | ||||
Description | Validation of N and N-1 rules do not consider existing OTE's. Creating generalized object types includes multiple OTE's which have seperate UC's. Therefor the N and N-1 rule may not be violated, in contrast with the rules. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
CaseTalk Edition | |||||
related to | 0001492 | assigned | BCP Software | Extend support for generalization |
related to | 0000461 | assigned | BCP Software | Split OTFT into two |
related to | 0001596 | assigned | BCP Software | UC Wizard on generalized objects fails |
related to | 0002880 | closed | BCP Software | Generalizations should not trigger N-Rule |
The attached images shows how a generalized OTFT contains warnings on both UC's and OTE's. Which is odd, since according to generalized structures, this should be okay. Therefor this issue illustrates a different validation approach may be required. Perhaps reducing the warning to simply "a generalized otft exists"? |
|
The BETA release will contain OTE/UC combination awareness for validation. See attached image N-Rule-Generalization-New.png. |
|
The N-Rule is now processing the PERSON correctly. Yet another generalization exists in CITIZEN, and the N-1 Rule might need work to process expressions too. |
|
UC Wizard places wide UC on Object Type Roles. This should be OTE aware as well. Similar the Solve function for the UC Validation Rule. |
|
Object Types and the N-Rule are now OTE aware. Fact Types have improved N-1-Rule detection. | |
Closing automatically, stayed too long in resolved state. Feel free to re-open with additional information if you think the issue is not resolved. | |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2015-05-07 12:22 | BCP Software | New Issue | |
2015-05-07 12:22 | BCP Software | Status | new => assigned |
2015-05-07 12:22 | BCP Software | Assigned To | => BCP Software |
2016-01-20 12:59 | BCP Software | Category | Validation => Well Formednes Rules |
2016-01-20 13:00 | BCP Software | Category | Well Formednes Rules => Model Validation |
2016-08-26 14:59 | BCP Software | Description Updated | |
2017-10-25 22:06 | BCP Software | Relationship added | related to 0001492 |
2017-10-25 22:08 | BCP Software | Relationship added | related to 0000461 |
2017-11-15 11:17 | BCP Software | File Added: N-Rule-Generalization.png | |
2017-11-15 11:17 | BCP Software | Note Added: 0001037 | |
2017-11-15 15:13 | BCP Software | File Added: N-Rule-Generalization-New.png | |
2017-11-15 15:13 | BCP Software | Note Added: 0001038 | |
2017-11-15 22:08 | BCP Software | File Added: N1-Rule_FactType.png | |
2017-11-15 22:08 | BCP Software | Note Added: 0001039 | |
2018-01-29 13:48 | BCP Software | Note Added: 0001097 | |
2018-02-02 16:44 | BCP Software | Relationship added | related to 0001596 |
2018-02-10 11:03 | BCP Software | Target Version | 9.0 => Future |
2019-02-18 09:56 | BCP Software | Status | assigned => resolved |
2019-02-18 09:56 | BCP Software | Resolution | open => fixed |
2019-02-18 09:56 | BCP Software | Fixed in Version | => 9.5.2 |
2019-02-18 09:56 | BCP Software | Note Added: 0001376 | |
2020-04-19 09:26 | BCP Software | Category | Model Validation => Validation |
2021-02-26 15:51 | BCP Software | Relationship added | related to 0002880 |
2022-01-10 20:40 | BCP Software | Note Added: 0002727 | |
2022-01-10 20:40 | BCP Software | Status | resolved => closed |