View Issue Details

Jump to NotesJump to History
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0003789CaseTalk ModelerGeneration (SQL, XML, etc)public2023-01-10 17:002023-01-25 10:24
ReporterBCP Software Assigned ToBCP Software  
PrioritynormalSeverityfeatureReproducibilityhave not tried
Status resolvedResolutionfixed 
PlatformIntelOSWindowsOS Version11
Target Version12.7Fixed in Version12.6.2 
Summary0003789: Generalizations with FTE in RDF
DescriptionGeneralizations become unionOf constructs in RDF. Unless an FTE exists in the Generalization. This needs investigating some more. Does this make sense, or is it more helpful to loose the FTE and keep the OT a Generaliation?
TagsNo tags attached.
CaseTalk Editionunknown

Activities

BCP Software

BCP Software

2023-01-25 10:24

administrator   ~0004751

A narrow FTE (single role) will no longer prevent the OT to be a generalization for UML/RDF output.

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2023-01-10 17:00 BCP Software New Issue
2023-01-10 17:00 BCP Software Status new => assigned
2023-01-10 17:00 BCP Software Assigned To => BCP Software
2023-01-16 14:23 BCP Software Target Version 12.6.1 => 12.6.2
2023-01-23 15:53 BCP Software Target Version 12.6.2 => 12.7
2023-01-25 10:24 BCP Software Status assigned => resolved
2023-01-25 10:24 BCP Software Resolution open => fixed
2023-01-25 10:24 BCP Software Fixed in Version => 12.6.2
2023-01-25 10:24 BCP Software Note Added: 0004751