An object type is now only presented as independent when it carries its own identification, on its own label types, as the documentation describes.

Where the identification is borrowed from other types, the object type is classified by what identifies it: identified through a single other type it is an aspect of that type, identified through two or more it is a relationship between them. This matches the familiar distinction between a strong entity, a weak entity and an associative entity.

An object type for which no identification has been recorded yet is left as it was, since the model does not yet say what identifies it.

The documentation and the behaviour now agree.